Designing Plastic Components for Robotically-Dispensed, Foam-in-Place Gasketing
While robotic technology improves design
flexibility, productivity and gasket performance, up-front attention to
component design can lead to even higher gains.
Robotic foam-in-place gasketing (FIPG) is an established technology for automating the gasketing of component parts used in the manufacture of plastic automotive, appliance and electrical components. Many plastic parts are amenable to the use of foam-in-place gaskets. However, up-front attention to mold and plastic part design is critical to capture the high productivity and superior performance of FIP gasket technology.
Some applications include vacuum cleaners, air filters, dishwashers, clothes dryers, dehumidifiers, air conditioners, freezers, refrigerators, ranges, air cleaners and computers. The potential benefits of the foam-in-place gasket approach are a significant reduction in labor costs, increased flexibility in both product and process design and seamless, high-performance gaskets.
The purpose of this article is to explore issues of part design that yield higher manufacturing productivity and improved gasket performance from the use of foam-in-place gaskets. First, though, a few words about the FIPG process.
The FIPG Process
An FIPG foam is a void-filled polymer matrix. The foam is applied
robotically to a part as a liquid or semi-liquid and cures to a solid
on the part. Foams can be one-component, such as hot melt or urethane
moisture cure; or two components, such as polyurethane or silicone.
One-component foams are produced by mechanically mixing an inert gas -
such as nitrogen - into the material, while two-component foams are
produced by the production of gas in a water-based side reaction as the
material is blended during the dispensing process. Selection of the
foam material depends on the application and the gasket performance
specifications. However, two-component polyurethane foams are most
widely used in the FIPG process since they offer the widest range of
physical properties.
The viscosity of different FIPG materials can vary widely, from a paint-like consistency to a thick paste (thixotropic). The way in which these materials flow onto a flat surface or into a groove has implications for part design. For both one- and two-component foams, the liquid - or semi-liquid - material must be applied to the substrate very accurately since curing will occur wherever the material is first laid down. The material cannot be adjusted or moved into position after the fact. For this reason, the material is almost always robotically applied. While round parts can sometimes be gasketed with a simple turntable, most applications require either a three- or six-axis robot.
It is the robotic's requirement that actually leads to some of the major benefits of FIPG, which are a reduction of labor and an increase in placement accuracy. So, robotic application also influences part design.
Fixturing is another important aspect of the FIPG process. Parts must be moved into and out of the dispense station accurately and quickly in order to ensure high productivity, and they must be presented to the robot in an optimal fashion. These factors also impact part design.
Optimal Part Design
Since FIPG materials can be applied either in a groove (liquid) or on a
flat surface (semi-liquid paste), most component parts can be converted
from manual gasketing to foam-in-place. However, a part that is
designed with the FIPG approach in mind will lead to both higher
production efficiency and optimal gasket performance. Following are
part design guidelines that help to achieve both of these objectives.
Stay Mainly on the Plane
While sloped regions as steep as 45 degrees can be accommodated, the
gasket should be dispensed onto as consistently horizontal a surface as
possible. This will simplify the robotic requirements and reduce any
potential slumping of the dispensed material. (A sloped application
requires a thixotropic FIPG material to avoid slumping.) The part also
should be designed so that it sits flat. This will ensure that the
material remains level during and immediately after foaming, thereby
avoiding additional table fixture costs.
Get in the Groove
Whenever possible, a groove should be designed into the part to accept
the gasket. A groove will allow the use of lower viscosity liquid
materials, which will self-level and avoid a visible "knit line" - the
point where the end of the gasket rejoins the beginning. A groove also
protects the gasket from wear and abuse. The groove walls should be
continuous and equal in height at all points so that the resulting
gasket is uniform.
Stay on the Straight, But Not the Narrow
Narrow groove width is probably the most common design error. Material
will not flow easily into a narrow groove, and air entrapment can
occur. Also, the dispense nozzle must have a small inside diameter,
which leads to a low flow rate and, thus, low robot speed. The overall
result is a longer dispense cycle time. Production rates can be
significantly increased by use of an appropriate groove width. While
groove widths as small as 1/8" can be gasketed, the groove should
preferably be from 3/16" to 3/4" wide. Also, the groove width should be
uniform around the part so that a constant robot speed and dispense
rate can be maintained. This will lead to a gasket of uniform height.
Don't Be Square
Corners - both for flat and grooved parts - should be rounded so that
the robot can maintain speed in the turns. The bottom of a groove also
should be rounded so that air is not entrapped while material flows
into the groove. These design features lead to higher robot speed and
increased production rates.
Practice Tolerance
The gasket should be compressed between 35 to 45 percent to ensure
proper sealing. Make sure that the tolerance between the mating
surfaces is not a significant fraction of the gasket height. For
example, if the tolerance between the parts is ± 0.030" (so 0.060" = 10
percent variation), the overall height of the gasket should be 0.600".
Obviously, you want the least part warpage as possible to occur.
No Knives Allowed
Mating surfaces should have a radius edge or flange rather than a knife
edge to minimize the chance of cutting the gasket surface when under
compression.
Stick to Your Reliefs
FIPG materials do not adhere well to polyethylene, polypropylene,
stainless steel, galvanized steel or aluminum. These plastic substrates
require either a groove or surface pre-treatment, while the metals
might require either a groove or priming.
A Clear Path Is a Good Path
Component parts should be free of obstacles such as posts or flanges that impede the movement of the robot or mix head.
A Smooth Surface for Smooth Sailing
The gasket surface should be free of rough surfaces created in the
injection molding process such as knock-out marks or gussets. This
reduces the chance of air entrapment that can lead to bubbles in the
gasket surface and compromise the integrity of the seal.
Summary
The FIPG process is a proven and cost-effective approach to gasketing
many existing appliance parts. However, optimal productivity and gasket
performance is best achieved by considering FIPG issues during the
initial component design process.
For more information contact John Snyder, president of Frazier Technologies, LLC (Aurora, IL) at (630) 906-6010, or Tom Chresand, senior engineer for H.B. Fuller Company (St. Paul, MN) at (651) 236-5312.













